Editorial


Myths and facts about perinatal marijuana use

,  

1 Pediatric Resident, UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA

2 Assistant Professor, UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA

3 Attending Neonatologist, Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise Children’s Hospital, Las, Vegas, NV, USA

Address correspondence to:

Mitali Sahni

MD, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sunrise Children’s Hospital, 3186 S Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89109,

USA

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 100013P05MS2021

doi: 10.5348/100013P05MS2021ED

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Singh MK, Sahni M. Myths and facts about perinatal marijuana use. Edorium J Pediatr 2021;5:100013P05MS2021.

ABSTRACT


No Abstract

Keywords: Cannabis breastfeeding, Marijuana, Pregnancy, THC

Editorial


With the increasing push toward the legalization and cultural acceptance of marijuana use, there is an urgent need to understand the effects that cannabis exposure can have on fetal development and growth. Despite abundant literature, there remains an uncertainty regarding the effect of marijuana use on neonatal and maternal outcomes due to ambiguous reports. These differences in study results, stems from varied study designs, inability to adjust for confounding factors like sociodemographic differences, tobacco use, and bias from self-reporting [1]. However, there is paucity of data associated with breastfeeding and marijuana use [2]. In general, exposure to any altering substance during periods of neurodevelopment has the potential to affect the developing brain, and can predispose children to psychiatric disorders [3]. Studies report illicit drug use in about 4% of pregnant women in the United States and, 75% of these cases report marijuana use [4]. More than 70% of women feel that marijuana use around 1–2 times a week poses no risk to the developing fetus [5]. This presumption accompanied with the heavily marketed use of medical marijuana in pregnancy to alleviate nausea, pain, as well as increased use for psychiatric disorders has led to a steady increase in marijuana use. For example, one study identifies a survey of 1749 participants in which 63% of women report marijuana use for depression and anxiety, 60% of women report marijuana use for relieving pain, and only 39% of women report a recreational use of marijuana [2].

The psychoactive component of cannabis is delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which has been found to cross the placenta and thus can affect the fetus [6] at levels equal to those in maternal plasma [5]. The cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) is the primary target in the brain for THC which has been associated with the dopamine system [7], the mesocorticolimbic, and nigrostriatal dopamine pathways that are essential for motor control, cognition, and emotional regulation [6]. The mesocorticolimbic circuit remains vulnerable to dysfunction later in life and is sensitive to developmental and environmental events. Patterning of the brain, such as postsynaptic target selectivity and functional differentiation of developing axons occurs during the prenatal period. Cannabis can thus affect this neuronal connectivity from occurring properly [7]. The longitudinal human studies evaluating perinatal cannabinoid exposure show disturbances in motor, social, and cognitive behaviors in exposed offspring [6]. Multiple studies have shown that newborns born with cannabinoid exposure tend to have increased tremors, exaggerated startle responses, and poor habituation to stimuli. On getting older, exposed children exhibited increased hyperactivity, inattention, impulsive symptoms, delinquency, and behavioral problems compared to children of their age who did not have any cannabinoid exposure [7]. In particular, one study demonstrates an association with the amount of maternal prenatal cannabis use to an increased CB1 mRNA expression in male subjects [6].

In addition to neurodevelopmental effects, studies have shown increased rates of fetal distress and growth restriction with prenatal cannabis exposure [7],[8]. Another study reports reduced head circumference at the ages of 9–12 years in children who were prenatally exposed to THC [4]. Tetrahydrocannabinol exposure can also cause inhibition of prolactin [9], growth hormone, and thyroid stimulating hormone, and stimulate corticotropin which ultimately leads to alterations in various hormone secretions [4]. Furthermore, THC is highly lipid soluble, so can concentrate in brain and body tissues for as long as 2–3 weeks, and has a high affinity for breast milk. Cannabinoids accumulate in breast milk to plasma, in a ratio of 8 to 1. Although this may not be enough for acute clinical effects in the infant [4], the high plasticity in the developing infant brain along with the long half-life of cannabinoids can cause even small exposures to alter neurobehavioral functioning [5].

The evidence regarding the effects of prenatal use of marijuana is not conclusive, especially for marijuana use during breastfeeding. As practitioners we should caution women regarding the unknown effects while still expressing concern about detrimental effect on fetus growth and development. More evidence is needed to make an informed clinical decision, but in the interim, we recommend following the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines which propose that women should be discouraged from using cannabis during pregnancy and while breastfeeding [10]. Both, human longitudinal cohort studies and animal models strongly identify the lasting impact that prenatal exposure can have on exposed offspring later in life [7]. Despite the increasing use of cannabinoids, there is limited awareness of the potential effects this drug can have on the fetus and infant [4], thus emphasizing the importance of health care providers educating patients about perinatal cannabinoid exposure.

REFERENCES


1.

Campolongo P, Trezza V, Ratano P, Palmery M, Cuomo V. Developmental consequences of perinatal cannabis exposure: Behavioral and neuroendocrine effects in adult rodents. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;214(1):5–15. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Metz TD, Borgelt LM. Marijuana use in pregnancy and while breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132(5):1198–210. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Hurd YL, Manzoni OJ, Pletnikov MV, Lee FS, Bhattacharyya S, Melis M. Cannabis and the developing brain: Insights into its long-lasting effects. J Neurosci 2019;39(42):8250–8. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

4.

Alapiti S, Hale TW. Effects of marijuana on the fetus and breastfeeding infant. Infant Risk Center at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center; 2015.   Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Scheyer AF, Melis M, Trezza V, Manzoni OJJ. Consequences of perinatal cannabis exposure. Trends Neurosci 2019;42(12):871–84. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Wang X, Dow-Edwards D, Anderson V, Minkoff H, Hurd YL. In utero marijuana exposure associated with abnormal amygdala dopamine D2 gene expression in the human fetus. Biol Psychiatry 2004;56(12):909–15. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

7.

Jutras-Aswad D, DiNieri JA, Harkany T, Hurd YL. Neurobiological consequences of maternal cannabis on human fetal development and its neuropsychiatric outcome. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;259(7):395–412. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

8.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, Division, Health Medicine, Practice, Board on Population Health Public Health, & Agenda, Committee on the Health Effects of Marijuana: An Evidence Review Research. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

9.

Metz TD, Stickrath EH. Marijuana use in pregnancy and lactation: A review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(6):761–78. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

10.

Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(4):e205–9. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Author Contributions

Manisha Kaur Singh - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Mitali Sahni - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Guaranter of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Source of Support

None

Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2021 Manisha Kaur Singh et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.